Several fundamental premises – often fashioned by leaders and supported by the led – exercise the ordinaire conscience of the added in so far as they stimulate a required development. The expansion is usually superior although not always civilized. The property showcased are of this form: “Our level of technical advancement is subordinate to none. Upon reaching this level, we also have to prepare our contemporary society for peace, and promise the peace, technology must be revised to create the policy of conflict. ” Technological advancement that is pushed in this effort sets a dangerous precedent for other communities that fear a risk to their respective sovereignties. They are pushed to also foster a battle technology. a fantastic read
In the website of civilization, this function of development is not praiseworthy, nor is it morally justifiable. Since it is not morally viable, it is socially irresponsible. An inspection of the premises will reveal it is the last the one which creates a problem. The previous premise is the bottom line of two preceding areas but is not in any way logically deduced. What it shows is a passionately deduced summary, and being so, it fails to be believed as a conclusion from a rationally prepared head, at least at the time at which it was deduced.
A contemporary society that advances in line with the above presuppositions – and especially in line with the illogical conclusion – has transmitted the mind of non-negotiable superiority to its people. All along, the potency of passion dictates the pace of human do. Whether in constructive sites to be or willed partnerships, the principle of equality does not work out to work precisely due to superiority syndrome that grabs the leader and the led. And another type of culture that refuses to reveal in the collective sensibilities or passion of such society has, by the expected logic, become a potential or actual opponent and faces confrontation on all possible fronts.
Many of what we should learn about the present world, obviously, via the media, is dominated by state-of-the-art technology. Societies which may have the almost all of such technology are also, over and over again, claimed to be the most advanced. It is far from only their advancement that lifts them to the pinnacle of power, brilliance, and fame. They can also use technology to simplify and move forwards an awareness of life and nature in a different direction, a direction that tends to eliminate, as much as possible, a prior connection between life and nature that was, in many respects, magical and unsafe. This previous point does not always mean that technological progression is a mark of a superior civilization.
That which we need to know is that civilization and technology are not conjugal conditions. Civilized people may offer an advanced technology or they might not exactly have it. World is not simply a subject of science and technology or technical infrastructure, or, again, the marvel of buildings; it even offers to do with the ethical and mental reflexes of folks as well as their level of social connectedness within their own contemporary society and beyond. It is from the general behavior cosmetic of men and women that all varieties of physical structures could be created, also the question of science and technology. Thus, the sort of links, roads, buildings, heavy devices, among others, that we can see in a society could tell, in a general way, the behavioural pattern of the individuals. Behavioural pattern could also tell a lot about the extent to which the surrounding has recently been utilized for infrastructural activities, science and technology. Over all, behavioural pattern could tell a lot about the perceptions and comprehension of the people about other people.
I really do believe – and, I believe, most people do believe – that after accelerating the rate of infrastructural activities and technology, the environment needs to recede in its naturalness. Once advancing technology (and its attendant structures or ideas) competes with the green environment for space, this environment that properties trees, grass, flowers, a myriad of animals and fish has to shrink in proportions. But the growth of populace, the relentless human desire for quality life, the need to control life without depending on unpredictable condition of the natural environment prompt the use of technology. Technology need not pose unwarranted danger to the natural environment. Is it doesn’t misuse of technology that is in question. When a society may justly utilize technology to improve quality of life, the people also have to ask: “how much technology do we need to safeguard the natural environment? ” Suppose society Sumado a blends the moderate use of technology with the environment in order to offset the reckless damage of these, then this kind of positioning requests the point that culture Y is an enthusiast of the principle of balance. From this basic principle, one can boldly consider that society Y favors stability more than damage, and has, consequently, the sense of moral and social responsibility. Any cutting edge technology points to the sophistication of the individual mind, and it signifies that the environment has been cavalierly tamed.